In the "quality of the laboratory accreditation assessment principle", the correct approach is defined as: in order to prevent the emergence of unqualified, defects or other unexpected circumstances, the elimination of the reasons for the adoption of the approach. Corrective action is an important activity to improve and improve the quality management system, is an important means to improve the quality management system. However, in the implementation of the author found that the implementation of corrective measures are not in place, which is one of the main issues affecting the usefulness of quality management system.

I think the main reason for the implementation of corrective measures are not in place:

First, the importance of the correct approach is not in place. Some quality inspection arrangements for the development of corrective measures and the implementation of corrective measures that are satisfied with the principles of assessment and have to do a burden, a mere formality. Not fundamentally know that this is to ensure the normal operation of the quality management system and to ensure the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system; establish the perfect mechanism of the most important and the most fundamental way. It is also the key question for the survival and development of the quality assurance arrangement in the highly competitive market.

Two is to correct the wrong understanding. In actual operation, often attack to matter for disposal of unqualified corrective corrective measures as. The corrective action means the method adopted in order to eliminate the cause of the nonconformity or other. Correction is the method adopted in order to eliminate detected nonconformities. Correct and correct way is different, the object is the reason of unqualified corrective measures, the correct object is unqualified; correct way is to analyze the reasons and take measures to correct, practical remedy.

Three is to verify the correctness of the method is not strictly required. In the "unqualified statement," the "corrective measures" column, the internal auditor often fill in the correct approach has been completed and other simple records. The internal auditor is reviewing department do not pay attention to analysis of unqualified reason is reasonable, whether there is a certain depth, are consistent with the actual operation; adopt corrective measures whether eliminate the unqualified reason; after the implementation of corrective measures to eliminate the unqualified whether similar attack again.

The four is the analysis of the reasons for the failure is not thorough, floating on the surface. For the unqualified statement, the Department in charge of the review department is often based on the point of view of the reasons for the failure and the adoption of corrective measures. Do not grasp the essence through the appearance, to deal with the problem fundamentally, and then develop a real solution to prevent such a recurrence of failure.

According to the above analysis, the author thinks that should be improved through the following ways and corrective measures of implementation is not in place: first, image quality management is the management at all levels of responsibility, but must have the leadership of top management, so the arrangement of the top management should be clear and continuous improvement of quality management system arrangement is the eternal principle, the right to know the role of and the significance of corrective measures, know to remedy the laboratory continuous improvement, continuous improvement measures, is in doubt after the adoption of action.

Second, personnel training. The quality control arrangement of small mixer should improve the overall nature of the whole staff, especially the nature of internal auditors and inspectors. Internal auditors must be trained and qualified to maintain relative independence and impartiality.

Third, the correct analysis of the reasons. Corrective measures should start from the investigation of the cause of the problem, the analysis is the most critical part of the corrective approach. To the careful analysis of all potential causes of doubt, the potential causes include: customer requirements, sample and sample status, methods and procedures, conditions, equipment and consumables, calibration, inspection personnel operation. Careful analysis of various types of records and information is the way to find the reasons for failure.

Fourth, increase the number of internal review. Internal review of corrective action tracking control more timely and useful. When the questions lead to doubt whether accord with laboratory procedures, compliance with the laboratory quality management system and evaluation principle, corrective measures once implemented, should be timely arrangements for internal review, check the usefulness of corrective measures.

Fifth, strengthen the monitoring of corrective measures. Quality control arrangements shall be monitored to ensure that corrective actions are implemented and useful to achieve desired results. Validation work should have a sense of responsibility, strong analytical ability, longer than the internal auditor to find doubt.

To sum up, regardless of the quality management system review, or exposure to the usual supervision and users complained in doubt, the laboratory shall promptly investigate reasons for these questions occur, analysis of relevant factors, to formulate and implement corrective measures, and verify the corrective effect after repeated to prevent similar questions to improve and enhance the operation intention, the level of quality management system.